data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17033/17033ebd1810f37c701c90fb3f1c9543daed0fec" alt=""
A few years ago I photographed some driftwood lying along a beach in Waterton Park. I took a number of shots but on going home, none struck me as great material. Almost a year later I rechecked the raw files (as I do occasionally when I haven't shot anything exciting lately) and noticed one image that I thought might work if converted to black and white. I still didn't like it but for some reason persisted and cropped a third of the image away. Starting to look promising - the general shapes were right. Unfortunately the picture had been taken with m y 10D and 70-200 at 200 mm. and the image was quite blurred. In hind site this is due to relying on the smaller f4 L Canon lens to be supported by the camera - not a great idea. I have since purchased a collar for the lens and hang the camera off the back end of the lens - much better. Anyway it was excedingly fuzzy but I persisted and with an application of a lot of sharpening in several goes with several different sharpening routines - unsharp mask, creative sharpen from Photokit, Output sharpen likewise, and some of them more than once, I had a fairly decent 10 X 10 image.
I continued to work on the image, using the techniques I have discussed before and am going into detail in the second and third installments of my articles on OutbackPhoto.com. It was starting to look really promising but it wasn't until I printed it that I really liked it, the image glowed, I really liked it.!
Now its three years later and things have improved. My original image was processed with camera raw version one in 8 bit (Photoshop didn't have 16 bit). It occurred to me recently that I might have another go at working on the image. I feared I'd never get that glow back, but I'd have the original output version, if it didn't work, I'd only be out a bit of time and effort.
I have to tell you times really have changed. This time I used one size up in the output of camera raw - it was incredibly fuzzy, but you know what - it sharpened quite nicely in smart sharpen with only an appropriate output sharpen. Here you see the latest version along with a 100% crop of the output from camera raw before any adjustments were made, and the whole file with in camera settings.
Lesson one - never throw away your raw files - protect them as well as your printing files. Hmmn...
Lesson two - never be afraid to have another go at something, starting all over, no matter how much time you have invested in the previous effort.
Original Camera Raw Output
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79113/79113738545bc34eb8b5bc62ac5d3e89fbcad8db" alt=""
Crop of unsharpened adjusted output of Camera Raw
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d02f9/d02f9b74de9ad3556fde76946c63728f6437f146" alt=""
Sharpened Version Of Final Image - 3200X2700 pixels - a crop from a 10D - print this at 300 dpi to get an idea of resolution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e647/6e647c88093962799a5e7ec33d5f348396c0f13e" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment