Sunday, September 30, 2007

Not Exactly A Car Wash...


Out for a walk with the dog this afternoon along the power line easement, I heard a helicopter in the distance coming closer and was amazed to see it flying at only about 80 feet above an urban neighbourhood. It soon became clear what he was doing.

A large boom which had been pointing forward and not seen against the bright sky swung out, the helicopter swung round and proceded to wash the insulators on the high tension lines. I watched for a while, finished my walk, grabbed my FZ50 and went back before they'd finished the entire stretch and was able to get these shots as they washed the last two pylons.

Amazing flying, remarkably steady, the boom only 4 feet from the insulators, the helicopter I suppose another 20 feet further away. Of course, they didn't turn off the power. Click on the images for a larger view.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Getting That All Important Feedback

I've had some nice things said about my images lately, and thank you all for that. Lest you think I'm getting a swelled head, yesterday my wife looked at a new image, and another one today.

1) "What lovely paper!" was her response to the first, and:

2) "try it upside down" to the second. Oh well...

Given that she's a great believer in my photography and can be very enthusiastic about my images, it's hard to ignore responses like these two.


Kind a' puts things in perspective, doesn't it.

Wall Of Shapes

Work Gloves


The gloves were sitting on the bench in this position. I did move a few small things from the background, moved the hammer which was lying in front of the gloves to on the gloves and in processing the image did remove a circular rust stain from the workbench.

And More...





Friday, September 28, 2007

Guess Where I Was, Again....




Wasn't sure I'd find anything to photograph, after all this is my sixth trip in two months to photograph Independent Machinery. Consistent with my comments earlier about not trying to redo previous work, I spent only a few minutes at the rack of metal sheets, taking a single picture, the rest of the three hours spent entirely in the one building. I found lots of interesting things and if they work out as well as I hope, these two are the first of several images from today's shoot.

As you can see though, I still can't decide if I'm a black and white or a colour photographer. I worry a little that I should be putting all my efforts into one or the other, particularly within a single subject such as this, but I'm damned if I'm prepared to lose either, so I carry on.

Certainly the idea of the repeat shoots here is the eventual development of one or two portfolios, though it occurred to me today that alternating colour and black and white on the wall might make an interesting show.

Well, back to working on some more of the images.

Have a good weekend.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Cave Roof



Below is the original image. As you can see, it's taken considerable work to create the final image. Normally lightening and darkening are done in areas that are already distinct, ie. they already have a tone that separates them from the other parts of the image. Sometimes though it can be helpful to lighten and darken parts of an evenly toned area, to give it depth, to create lines that didn't really exist in the original, but reinforce the composition. Cheating? I suppose, but it's being creative and I don't see it as any more cheating than using a red filter to make unrealistic skies - Ansel did that!

It was important not to overdo the contrast and end up with a poster like effect. Careful drawing of the curve adjustment graphs helped. Tonality was increased with unsharp mask (25/50/0) as well as an earlier subtle application of Akvis Enhancer (ie. the effect was toned down after it was applied). I now routinely duplicate the image in another layer and apply Akvis to that layer so I can adjust the effect at any point in the future, both globally with the layers opacity slider, and also locally through masking of the layer. In this instance though, the unsharp mask did more for the image.

Andy Ilachinski Gets A Book Published

Remember that contest at Black and White Photography, for the chance to publish your book, well Andy won. Well done and well deserved Andy. I had to ask him what happened - modest fellow!

Bedroom Image



I also tried the same image with the verticals corrected, but prefer the 'crazy' angles of the 'straight' version above.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Working The Machine Shop

There's been a fair amount of interest in my Machine Shop project so I thought some might enjoy or even find it useful to talk about how it came about and how I 'worked the scene', not a topic you find much of in books - oh they'll tell you how to compose, but the actual process of being presented with a subject (the shop) and actually checking around for interesting things to photograph is less well discussed. I've done a little in prev. blogs relative to specific images, and have gone further in the book (yes, it's still being edited) and decided to tell you about this project.

As you probably know, I have an interest in old industrial subjects anyway, so when I cruised round an old neighborhood in Calgary, discovering Independent Machinery, an obviously old collection of buildings raised interest. I peered through the windows into a pile of junk, so much it was hard to imagine I'd be able to find a simple composition. No one was around and I wandered off.

When I went out shooting with a friend, I remembered the place and we drove by. The gates were open and there were people around. With the confidence of having a friend there too, I had no hesitation about going in and asking and they were very cooperative.

Now I had to figure out how I was going to photograph the place. The oldest part of the shop was just as cluttered as I remembered and I doubted I could find an image there (though I did later). I headed instead for the newer part of the shop, with sunlight pouring through south facing and very dirty windows, backed by trees outside so showing quite a bit of green in the windows, all be it blurred by the dirt - quite nice. The shop was fairly cluttered too but there was a position from which I could put most of it behind me and focus on the south wall. it was moderately interesting and I photographed it on it's own. I looked around to see how I could improve it and noted a chain hanging from a lift and felt that it would make good foreground.

I realized it was way too close for depth of field to manage the situation and were I to move further back, the chain lost prominence, so my position was fairly fixed a couple of feet back from the chain. I made two exposures, one focussed on the chain, the other on the wall in the background.

After that picture, I looked at some fairly modern looking workbenches covered in tools, but couldn't see patterns in the chaos and in the end though I did take a couple of pictures, they were as bad as I'd been afraid of (but I didn't spend a lot of time on them, and you never know...)

I was intrigued by the tightly packed copper tubing of heat exchangers an spent some time on that - though in the end that's my weakest image of the shoot. I wandered into the old part of the place, confirmed that I couldn't make anything out of the clutter and looked for interesting details. I was quite excited to find the pipe benders sitting in the dark on a bench (30 second exposure). It was interesting though. I wasn't sure they were in the best position and I realized I could basically put them in whatever pattern I wanted - it's a lot harder to arrange things like a painter, much easier to take what you've got and make the best of it. I'm not sure even now and after a second shoot of the pipe benders that I have got the definitive image.

They were a pretty obvious thing to photograph though as the surface had a lovely patina to it - not too shiny, but some great highlights. I tried a fairly symetrical arrangement but that looked too artificial (after all it was). I tried a bit more jumbled and liked that better. I set them up so one led to the next, fairly nice, but still a little 'arranged'.

By this time, my friend was in the building and I decided it might be best to move on so I wandered over to a third building (the newest) in which I found drill presses, milling machines and giant lathes. I liked the lathe but couldn't find a really good composition. THe drill press was ok, but not great, the bench had some interesting widgets on it so I photographed those, moving a few bolts around for a better pattern. (rounding up the strays - hey, I live in Calgary).

I then found a small wooden box full of odd shapes of metal of a variety textures and tones. These were definitely interesting and I was fairly sure I had a good image here. Unfortunately I hadn't noticed that in photographing it next to the wall, one edge was very much in shadow. I have made successful prints but I really had to bring up the shadows and also do a substantial amount of cloning of metal parts to extend them, and the image isn't top drawer as a result. This was the biggest reason to go back for a second shoot and that's a story for another day.

So, you might ask, how did I actually go about finding these things to photograph? The obvious answer is I just did, through years of practice. On a more practical level though, I know I was looking for interesting shapes and surfaces that photographed well. I had no special agenda, had no special point to make, other than perhaps to say in the end, see how fascinating the stuff is at an ordinary machine shop?

Well used tools that are not painted have a lovely surface. If it's curved, even better. Much of the place had so many things going on, finding an image was more than difficult and most of my success has been with parts of things, close ups or isolated details, like the lights.

The things that I have found on subsequent trips I didn't even have the slightest inkling of on the first visit.

There were lots of images I walked away from because even though the parts were excellent, the whole just didn't work. Perhaps I'm a bit obsessive about composition but it's what works for me, I have to be able to make some sense out of the parts - they have to work together for me, and certainly I tend to most admire work that is strongly composed. Composition is certainly not the whole story, but it's an important and probably essential part for me.

In the end, my search was for 'neat' things, before looking for 'neat' photographs.

Tripod Features

For those of you who haven't committed to using a tripod regularly yet, here's some things to think about:

1) I don't know a single experienced photographer who uses a tripod with braces from the centre column to the legs, and most prevent the legs from swinging out for low work and irregular terrain and special situations.

2) likewise the use of anything but a ball head unless you are shooting large format - virtually all of us have converted over to ball heads of various designs and prices.

3) a tripod that goes to at least nipple height without the head and without raising the centre column is essential for a normal use tripod, though you may wish to compromise on a lightweight travel pod.

4) if you do a lot of stitching, you need something to level the rotation of the ball head - I use a leveller from Manfrotto on my Gitzo tripod, works really well.

5) number of sections really depends on quality of construction - lots of people decry 4 section legs but that's what I use and that extra height is sometimes very handy.

6) there are a few times that I have missed the ability to reach out horizontally, say over a wall and then shoot down, so there is definitely something to be said for the new manfrotto and other tripods that have swinging or positionable centre columns.

7) some say that you should never use a centre column becuase it isn't steady, but I have several portfolio images in which it was useful or even essential.

8) Carbon fibre is nice, but hardly essential. Wood can be good too and sure repairs a lot easier after jambing a leg in the car door. For a long time I used a Berlebach tripod with good results, though once I switched to dSLR's and a tall ballhead, it wasn't as stable beween the centre column and the head as I'd like. The swivelling centre post (essentially a ball joint with a hole in the middle for the centre post) was a great idea. I have even thought of getting a new centre column with a more solid top for the ball head. That tripod took abuse no metal or carbon fibre tripod would stand.

9) little spikes on tripod feet really don't do much for me - if the tripod isn't stiff enough to stand on ice on it's own, you have too loose a tripod. Big spikes like the Zone VI tripod used to have serve their function, but soft marshy ground isn't going to be fixed by any spike less than 10 feet long, so I don't consider spikes essential and I don't have them on my Gitzo.

10) quick release heads are nice, and for a dSLR, an L bracket is wonderful - but not cheap - Manfrotto make some nice inexpensive ball heads with quick release plates, and they don't have the problem of the camera sliding out of the plate holder because of being two instead of three dimensionally held. Mind you, my really right stuff lever release clamp has never ever let go and there's something about a clamp in which you can see from it's position that it's on - which you can't with a rotating knob. With knobs, I just get a bit paranoid and check frequently - never lost a camera yet and I do carry the 1Ds2 over my shoulder on the end of the tripod.

A New Camera

With the spate of new dSLR cameras from Canon, Nikon, Sony, some with pretty impressive previews, the itch to run out and buy a new camera has to be getting stronger. I know I suffer the itch.

Here's some things to think about though.

1) whatever you buy is going to be superseded by a better model within a year, and probably less, possibly for less money.

2) A swinging LCD screen is an obvious addition to a dSLR - so obvious it's hard to believe it hasn't been added yet. I'm still confused about the pixel count on the new Nikon - one site even showed pictures of how much finer it is - so so much for the talk of pixels versus dots. That said, can you imagine how handy a camera with a 4 inch screen (I think there's room) which tilts would be - even newspaper photographers would find it a godsend and for still life, macro, flower, even landscape work, it would be awesome. I strongly suspect this is only a model away (that's to say, better than even odds that we'll see it within the year).

3) Michael Reichmann points out that Nikon has autofocus in live view while Canon has to flip the mirror. Anyone bet that won't be on the next Canon? (too late for the 1Ds3?).

4) Initial enthusiasm for the new is often tempered over time with more realistic estimates of quality. I've been burned by acting on enthusiastic reviews, only to find within a month or two, all the problems surface. Whether it's the arcane interface and problems with the Canon 5000 printer or it's ink so glossy it doesn't work well with any of the glossy art papers yet produced or the autofocus problems of the 1D3, the infrared problems of the Leica M8, history is so full of (if I'd waited, I would have been warned) that even if you are interested in the current new generation of cameras, you might well want to curb that enthusiasm.

There, now if only I can control myself.

Gary Nylander On Using A View Camera

Gary had made a great comment to my 'Is The View Camera Dead' entry so I asked him to write about using the view camera and he has posted this to his blog. Gary's excellent images can be found at his website.

Monday, September 24, 2007

Tripod Use

After my walkabout yesterday, as I checked out the images I made, several had hand shake issues. I had noticed on the walk that my hands aren't as steady as they used to be so it was hardly a surprise. None of the images couldn't have used a tripod and presumably there would have been sig. fewer flawed images - rejected for hand shake despite image stabilization.

I'd thought that not taking the tripod would let me concentrate more on seeing, but in hind sight, I don't think that's true. Had I put my lightweight tripod on the camera and carried both over my shoulder, I could just as easily have wandered around. Setup might take a few seconds more but I don't think it would have interfered with the experience.

On the other hand, I have been thinking of photographing in an old part of town, with shoppers around. Setting up a tripod could well be problematic in that situation and grabbing shots between pedestrians might well depend on not using a tripod. Were I to include the shoppers, then even more the tripod would likely be in the way.

I guess what it comes down to is:

Always use a tripod unless you have a GOOD reason not to.

I'll try another casual walk later this week, with lightweight tripod and let you know the outcome.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Out For A Walk






Not in the mood for a serious shoot, I nevertheless wanted to get out with my camera, so grabbed the FZ50, didn't even take the camera bag, and wandered the back lanes for an hour round my neighbourhood. Absolutely nothing that would make a portfolio, but pleasant and probably doesn't hurt to exercise my eye and brain a little. All of the images would have been better quality had I taken my tripod and good camera, but then I wouldn't have gone out - so...

Machine Shop 5


Technically challenging, with huge flare from the windows (in fact the only light source), it took some work to correct as best possible for the flare. I also had to remove a couple of aperture shaped flare spots in addition to adjusting the contrast and shadows.

I like the angled lines of the image though, in the ladder and the walls, the storage bins and the roof beams.

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Brian Kosoff

And here's another portfolio to check out, this from APUG, the analog photographers group - ie. film.

Brian Kosoff

and Brian's own website

apologies for the earlier mistake in Brian's last name.

Machine Shop Variation

Sometimes you have to choose between two relatively similar images. First is an image I worked on tonight, a wider view, a bit more complex, which might be interpreted as cluttered) but I like the corners of the sheets at the bottom and top. The first image includes the drum in the bottom right, but I have toned it down.



Or perhaps this one, which was the earlier image I worked on. This image has a better splay, but it's a simpler design.



At the moment, I think I prefer the first image, though who's to say how I'll feel tomorrow, never mind next week. I'll live with the images for a few weeks before deciding. In this case the images are probably too similar to include both in a portfolio.

Interestingly, were I submitting for publication, I might well send both, letting the editor choose which they prefer - they like having a choice, and they may pick one over another for entirely different reasons than you might consider - such as which goes better with the other images, how it will look in reproduction, shape relative to page, and so on.

Photo Net

Occasionally I'll check on what's happening at Photo.Net and found the following two photographers.
Ben Goosens - amazing skill at creating these imaginary images - not a style of photography I like but I can certainly admire it, and know what, I actually do like some of the images. Not such a stick in the mud as I thought?

Camilo Margeli - a fair amount of repetition but there are some lovely images here none the less and his skill with macro is impressive.

Finally, New Image Of The Month


With a reminder from Andrew, I finally changed the image of the month, and to simplify things, I have limited it to a single print, one size, 8.5X11 and as an experiment, dropped the price, including shipping to $25.

I'm going to do this print on Canon Photo Paper Plus Semi Gloss on the 5000.

We'll see how this flies.

From the image description:

From my recent Independent Machinery series of images, this shows a rack of perforated steel sheets used in the shop to assemble a variety of oilfield and other equipment. It really does look like an abstract painting to me. Shot with my Canon 1Ds2, Canon 17-40 mm. lens, three blended images with focus adjusted between and the images blended in Helicon Focus for increased depth of field. Not only can this increase depth of field, I can use the optimum f stop, in this case f9 at 1.6 seconds exposure, iso 100, lens at 31 mm.